What is Proactive Maintenance and How it Differs from Other Maintenance Strategies?

Article Written by:

Muthu Karuppaiah

What is Proactive Maintenance and How it Differs from Other Maintenance Strategies?
Table of Contents

What is Proactive Maintenance?

Proactive maintenance, also called condition based maintenance, is a preventative strategy that involves fixing potential equipment problems before they become major. It relies on regular monitoring and maintenance of equipment to catch small issues early and deal with them right away, thereby preventing larger and more costly failures from occurring.

Proactive maintenance aims to extend the life of the equipment and reduce maintenance costs by preventing unnecessary repairs and replacements. It typically involves regular inspections, routine servicing, and replacing parts known to wear out over time.

Some common examples of proactive maintenance include replacing worn-out belts on machinery, oiling moving parts to prevent friction, and performing regular safety checks.

How It Differs From Other Maintenance Strategies

Reactive Maintenance
Unlike proactive maintenance, reactive maintenance involves waiting for equipment to fail before taking action. Although it can be less expensive in the short term, reactive maintenance can lead to higher costs in the long term due to unanticipated downtime and the possibility of more extensive damage caused by equipment failure.
Preventive Maintenance
While similar to proactive maintenance in that they both aim to prevent equipment failure, preventive maintenance is time-based, meaning that maintenance tasks are performed at predetermined intervals, regardless of whether there are signs of equipment wear or impending failure. On the other hand, proactive maintenance is condition-based, with tasks being performed to detect changes in equipment condition that indicate an impending failure.
Predictive Maintenance
Predictive maintenance is further from proactive maintenance. It leverages data analysis, machine learning, and predictive modeling to predict when equipment failure might occur based on real-time data collected through various sensors. Predictive maintenance allows organizations to move from scheduled routine checks to more targeted maintenance performed just in time to prevent predicted failures.
Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM)
RCM involves analyzing all the possible failure modes for each piece of equipment and then deciding on the most cost-effective maintenance strategy, which can be any combination of the above. Proactive maintenance might be the most effective strategy for some failure modes, but not all.

Advantages of Proactive Maintenance

Reduced Downtime
By addressing problems early, proactive maintenance can significantly reduce unexpected equipment failures and associated downtime.
Cost Savings
While proactive maintenance requires an upfront investment, it can lead to significant cost savings in the long run. Preventing major breakdowns reduces the need for expensive repairs or replacements.
Extended Equipment Lifespan
Regularly maintaining equipment and fixing minor issues can extend the lifespan of your assets, leading to a better return on investment.
Improved Safety
Proactive maintenance can also lead to safer working conditions by identifying and addressing potential safety issues before they become serious.
Increased Operational Efficiency
With less downtime and more reliable equipment, operations run more smoothly, increasing productivity and efficiency.

Disadvantages of Proactive Maintenance

Requires Investment
Proactive maintenance requires an upfront investment in maintenance resources and, perhaps, technology to monitor equipment conditions.
Over-Maintenance
If not properly managed, proactive maintenance could lead to unnecessary maintenance tasks, wasting time and resources; This is particularly true if equipment condition is not monitored effectively.
Resource-Intensive
Proactive maintenance can be resource-intensive, requiring trained personnel to perform regular checks and maintenance tasks.
Dependent on Skill and Experience
The success of proactive maintenance can be highly dependent on the skill and experience of the maintenance team. Incorrectly identifying potential problems can lead to unnecessary work or missed issues.

To maximize the benefits and mitigate the disadvantages of proactive maintenance, it is essential to have a well-planned maintenance strategy in place; This involves determining which assets are most critical and would benefit from proactive maintenance, training staff, and utilizing the right tools and technologies. Proactive maintenance can be a valuable strategy for increasing equipment reliability and operational efficiency with the right approach.

When comparing Proactive Maintenance (PM) and Predictive Maintenance (PdM) from a reliability standpoint, both strategies have their strengths and play critical roles in a comprehensive maintenance strategy. Here's how they stack up:

Proactive Maintenance

Proactive Maintenance includes routine inspections, regular servicing, and preventive measures to keep equipment in optimal working condition. The goal is to catch and correct minor issues before they become major problems. PM can help extend equipment life, reduce failures, and lower repair costs. However, PM can sometimes lead to over-maintenance, where resources are wasted on servicing equipment that doesn't need it.

From a reliability perspective, PM increases the dependability of equipment by reducing the likelihood of sudden failures. Regular check-ups ensure that equipment is always in good working condition and can be relied upon for continuous operation.

Predictive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance, on the other hand, involves monitoring equipment condition during normal operation to predict when maintenance should be performed. This approach uses data, machine learning, and predictive analytics to determine equipment health. PdM can help prevent unexpected equipment failures, improve Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), and reduce unnecessary maintenance or unplanned downtime costs.

In terms of reliability, PdM can significantly improve the availability and reliability of equipment. By predicting failures before they occur, PdM allows maintenance to be planned and scheduled at the most reasonable time, thus preventing unplanned downtime and production losses.

Comparison

While PM focuses on regular, scheduled maintenance, PdM performs maintenance tasks just before they are expected to fail. In essence, PM can be viewed as a time-based strategy, while PdM is a condition-based strategy.

The choice between the two often depends on the specific context, including the criticality of the assets, the availability of resources, and the organization's risk tolerance. Ideally, a blend of PM and PdM would be part of an organization's maintenance strategy. High-critical assets might be better suited for PdM due to their impact on operations, while less-critical assets could be managed effectively with a well-planned PM program.

In the context of reliability, PdM has a slight edge as it aligns closely to increase equipment uptime and availability. However, the PM still plays a vital role in maintaining the overall health of the equipment and ensuring smooth operations. Combining both strategies in a balanced way can lead to the highest equipment reliability.

Let's take the story of a savvy Maintenance Manager, Mark, and his new sidekick, Cryotos.

Like every other Maintenance Manager, Mark was once working with piles of paperwork, juggling multiple checklists, and racing against time. But one fine day, he had a visitor - Cryotos, a cutting-edge CMMS Software. Like Batman meeting Robin for the first time, Mark wasn't sure what to make of this newcomer.

Mark started using Cryotos hesitant at first, just for the small tasks. It was like asking the new kid on the block to run to the store for a candy bar - a test of sorts. And Cryotos delivered every time! It began with simple reminders for routine maintenance and then moved on to identifying equipment nearing its critical condition.

One day, Cryotos picked up on a minuscule anomaly that Mark would have typically missed. It notified Mark about a potential issue with the boiler, like an alert sidekick whispering, "Boss, this doesn't seem right." Mark inspected the boiler, and it was headed toward failure. Like a superhero duo averting a crisis, they saved the day, preventing costly downtime.

Mark was so impressed that he began referring to Cryotos as his "Robin." It became the perfect sidekick he didn't know he needed, alerting him about impending issues and helping him implement a preventive maintenance strategy. And the best part? Cryotos never asked for a day off!

Slowly, Mark's facility turned into a well-oiled machine, thanks to Cryotos. Mark became the hero of his organization, all while maintaining his sense of humor. He often joked, "With Cryotos around, I don't even need my morning coffee!"

And so, Mark and Cryotos continued their maintenance adventures, battling downtime, reducing repair costs, and improving efficiency – all with a dash of humor. A perfect pair in the world of maintenance management, just like Batman and Robin!

References

Proactive maintenance

Predictive Maintenance vs Proactive Maintenance. Why Not Both?

Choosing the right maintenance strategy

Maintenance strategies: How advanced is your program?

Want to Try Cryotos CMMS Today? Lets Connect!
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Related Post